The Board denied an earlier effective date for a 60% rating for atrial septal defect with Amplatzer device closure due to the lack of evidence showing the Veteran's heart disability met the criteria for such rating prior to June 8, 2018.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's heart disability did not meet the criteria for a 60% rating at any time during the appeal period prior to June 8, 2018.
- Claimed conditions
- Atrial Septal Defect
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 60%
- Decision date
- May 21, 2020
- Citation
- 20035496
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20035496.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claim of service connection for a heart disorder, as it is unclear if there was an additional disability due to disease or injury superimposed upon the Veteran's congenital atrial septal defect during service.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the veteran's atrial septal defect, which was present prior to service and not aggravated by military service, does not warrant service connection.
- Granted
The Board found that the veteran's heart disorder, which was a congenital condition preexisting her service, increased in severity during service and is related to her surgery. The Board granted service connection for this condition.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.