Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's COPD is not considered service-connected because it was not shown to be related to his military service. The Board has found the VA examination report and opinion to be of great probative value.,The Veteran's hair loss is presumed due to herbicide agent exposure, but there is no evidence linking this condition to his military service. Therefore, the claim for hair loss will be remanded for further development.,Seborrheic keratosis is presumed due to herbicide agent exposure and the Board has found that it is not related to the Veteran's military service. The claim for seborrheic keratosis will also be remanded for further development.,Basal cell carcinoma is presumed due to herbicide agent exposure, but there is no evidence linking this condition to the Veteran's military service. Therefore, the claim for basal cell carcinoma will be remanded for further development.

The deciding factor: The COPD was not shown to have been incurred or aggravated by service and the VA examiner found that it was more likely related to smoking rather than herbicide exposure.,There is no evidence linking hair loss to the Veteran's military service, despite the presumption of exposure. The claim will be remanded for further development.,Seborrheic keratosis is presumed due to herbicide agent exposure but there is no evidence linking it to the Veteran's military service. The claim will be remanded for further development.,Basal cell carcinoma is presumed due to herbicide agent exposure, but there is no evidence linking it to the Veteran's military service. The claim will be remanded for further development.

Claimed conditions
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder (COPD), Hair Loss, Seborrheic Keratosis, Basal Cell Carcinoma
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 2, 2020
Citation
20037412

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20037412.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.