Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Board has determined that the Veteran's substantive appeal was timely filed in response to a February 2012 Statement of the Case, which denied an increased rating for hypertension and service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder. The appeal is granted.

The deciding factor: The evidence supports the contention that the Veteran’s representative did not receive a copy of the SOC until March 18, 2016, and the substantive appeal was filed within 60 days of receiving the copy of the SOC.

Claimed conditions
Hypertension, Acquired psychiatric disorder
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 2, 2020
Citation
20037533

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20037533.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.