The Board has decided to remand the case for further examination and research regarding the Veteran's claims of residuals from chemotherapy involving Docetaxel. The examiner is asked to determine if any additional disabilities are related to the treatment, whether caused by VA carelessness or negligence, and to provide a discussion of relevant research.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the current medical opinions were insufficient for adjudicative purposes and requested further examination and research regarding the Veteran's claims.
- Claimed conditions
- muscular, orthopedic, neurological, skin
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 4, 2020
- Citation
- 20038509
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20038509.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for left knee disability, lumbar spine disability, bilateral shoulder disability, and skin disability due to a lack of evidence showing an in-service injury or disease that led to these conditions.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew her appeal for service connection for various conditions, including skin, groin and hip issues, proteinuria, joint pain/fibromyalgia, hematuria, vitamin D deficiency, and gum condition with surgery. The Board dismissed the appeal due to the withdrawal.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities are found to not meet the criteria for specially adapted housing or special home adaptation grant due to lack of a VA examination. The case is being remanded for such an evaluation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to conflicting evidence regarding when he stopped working and the need for further information on his income during the years at issue. The TDIU claim remains pending as it is intertwined with other claims for increased ratings.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.