The Board has remanded the case due to conflicting medical evidence regarding whether the Veteran had pulmonary tuberculosis during service and if this condition contributed to his death. The appellant is seeking service connection for the cause of her husband's death, which may be related to a service-connected disability.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there was insufficient evidence to establish service connection due to conflicting medical opinions regarding the presence of TB in service and its relationship to the Veteran's later respiratory impairment and death.
- Claimed conditions
- Pulmonary Tuberculosis
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 8, 2020
- Citation
- 20038914
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20038914.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied a higher rating for the Veteran's service-connected pulmonary tuberculosis, finding that the decrease from 100% to 30% effective July 1, 2020 was proper and that a higher rating is not warranted based on the evidence provided.
- Denied
The Board denied a compensable rating for the Veteran's inactive pulmonary tuberculosis, finding that dyspnea on exertion was not accompanied by lesions.
- Denied
The Board denied the petition to reopen service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, as well as claims for nonservice-connected pension benefits and accrued benefits due to lack of new and material evidence. The Veteran did not have qualifying service in the Philippine Scouts that would allow him to receive these benefits.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided the claim for COPD secondary to TB is remanded due to inadequate medical opinions and need for further development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.