The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's peripheral vascular disease, specifically whether it is related to herbicide agent exposure or his service-connected diabetes mellitus type II.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner did not provide a clear opinion on the etiology of the Veteran’s peripheral vascular disease and its relation to herbicide agent exposure or his service-connected diabetes mellitus type II.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral lower extremity peripheral vascular disease
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 12, 2020
- Citation
- 20040288
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20040288.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral lower extremity peripheral vascular disease and superficial thrombophlebitis, finding that these conditions are related to the Veteran's service-connected right total knee replacement residuals and sarcoidosis.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has reopened the claims for service connection for interphalangeal keratosis in both feet, bilateral lower extremity peripheral vascular disease, and right toe amputation due to new evidence. The claims are now remanded for a VA opinion on the etiology of these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran's hypertension, bilateral lower extremity peripheral vascular disease, coronary artery disease, atherosclerosis, and kidney disease are related to service due to herbicide exposure in Okinawa. However, the evidence is insufficient for VA to make this determination without further development.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for bilateral lower extremity peripheral vascular disease, finding no evidence linking the condition to service or service-connected coronary artery disease.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.