The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a skin condition, finding that there was no evidence to support a link between his current skin conditions and his military service, including exposure to herbicide agents.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner found no causal relationship between the Veteran’s skin condition and his military service, including exposure to herbicide agents.
- Claimed conditions
- warts, moles, rashes
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 18, 2020
- Citation
- 20041535
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20041535.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of an opinion on the nature and etiology of the Veteran's skin disability, including his exposure to herbicides while serving in Korea. The AOJ is required to obtain University of Michigan medical records and prepare an Individual Longitudinal Exposure Record for the Veteran.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for warts, BPH, and sleep apnea due to potential secondary or aggravation by a service-connected psychiatric disability. The Veteran's claim for warts is denied as he does not have a current diagnosis of warts.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for obstructive sleep apnea as secondary to service-connected PTSD. The claims for moles, lipomas, and a skin disability (white patches) caused by exposure to herbicide agents have been dismissed.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for an increased rating for tinnitus, service connection for PTSD, artery disorder, eating disorder, and rashes.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.