The Veteran's tinnitus had its onset during service, and the claim for service connection is granted.,New evidence has been received that relates to unestablished facts necessary to substantiate the claims for entitlement to service connection for a psychiatric disorder (including depression and PTSD), and disorders of the right hand and bilateral fingers. Therefore, these claims are reopened.,No new and material evidence was received to reopen the claims for entitlement to service connection for a bilateral ankle disorder, bilateral knee disorder, left hand disorder, carpal tunnel syndrome, or disorders of the right hand and bilateral fingers. These claims remain denied on the merits.,The Veteran's current bilateral elbow disorder is not related to his service, as there was no evidence of such during service. The claim for reopening is denied.,No new and material evidence was received to reopen the claim for entitlement to service connection for a left hand disorder. This claim remains denied on the merits.,New and material evidence has been received that relates to unestablished facts necessary to substantiate the claims for entitlement to service connection for carpal tunnel syndrome, but these claims remain denied on the merits.,No new and material evidence was received to reopen the claims for entitlement to service connection for disorders of the right hand and bilateral fingers. These claims remain denied on the merits.,The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder (including depression and PTSD) is related to his service, as there is nexus evidence linking it to service. The claim for reopening is granted.
The deciding factor: The new evidence includes diagnoses of depression and PTSD dated in January 2017, and a January 2019 private opinion that links the Veteran's PTSD to service.,The new evidence includes VA treatment records showing complaints of ankle pain and gout attacks during service. However, no nexus evidence linking these conditions to service was provided.,VA treatment records show progression of arthritis in both knees post-service. The February 2008 VA examiner opined that the Veteran's joint complaints were less likely than not related to service and more likely due to his work history.,The new evidence includes a March 2015 VA examination stating that the current bilateral elbow disorder is unrelated to service, based on the absence of progressive or chronic conditions during service and the possibility of injuries sustained in construction work post-service.,No nexus evidence linking the left hand disorder to service was provided. The Veteran's contention aligns with his previous claims without supporting new evidence.,The new evidence includes a March 2015 VA examination stating that the current carpal tunnel syndrome is unrelated to service, based on the absence of progressive or chronic conditions during service and the possibility of work-related injuries post-service.,No nexus evidence linking disorders of the right hand and bilateral fingers to service was provided. The Veteran's contention aligns with his previous claims without supporting new evidence.,The new evidence includes a January 2019 private opinion stating that the acquired psychiatric disorder (including depression and PTSD) is related to service, based on nexus evidence linking it to service.
- Claimed conditions
- tinnitus, bilateral ankle disorder, bilateral knee disorder, bilateral elbow disorder, left hand disorder, carpal tunnel syndrome, disorders of the right hand and bilateral fingers, acquired psychiatric disorder (including depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD))
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 19, 2020
- Citation
- 20042003
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20042003.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hearing loss, tinnitus, and an acquired psychiatric disorder due to incomplete medical records and need for further examination.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for tinnitus, arthritis, and memory loss. The decision found no evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Granted
The Veteran's tinnitus is granted as service connected. The issues of foot disability and cardiovascular disorder are remanded for additional development.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for tinnitus, finding that it is at least as likely as not that the Veteran experienced tinnitus during his active duty service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.