The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for left eye impaired vision, finding that his diagnosed conditions are congenital defects and not due to any in-service injury or disease.
The deciding factor: There is no evidence of a superimposed injury or disease during service that resulted in additional disability, and the Veteran's current eye conditions are considered congenital in nature.
- Claimed conditions
- nuclear sclerosing cataracts, glaucoma suspect, refractive errors
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 22, 2020
- Citation
- 20042280
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20042280.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for refractive errors, headaches, back disability, and depression.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a duty to assist error and for an opinion on whether the Veteran's eye disabilities, including nuclear sclerosis and glaucoma suspect, are related to his service-connected residuals of traumatic brain injury.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's eye disability, including photophobia, cataract, glaucoma suspect, retinal drusen, lattice degeneration, and vitreous syneresis, is being remanded for further review due to inconsistencies in the medical opinions provided. The examiner must address whether these conditions are related to service or secondary to his service-connected allergic rhinitis.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for CML, erectile dysfunction as secondary to CML, bilateral hip arthritis, and hypertension. The Veteran's eye disorder was not found related to his hypertension.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.