The Veteran's erectile dysfunction is not related to service.,The earliest communication from the Veteran that can be construed as a claim for major depressive disorder was received on June 8, 2016. The effective date of June 8, 2016 has been assigned for major depressive disorder as it is later than the earliest date of entitlement (April 27, 2016).,The earliest communication from the Veteran that can be construed as a claim for residuals of a surgical scar on his left shoulder was received on March 11, 2016. The effective date of March 11, 2016 has been assigned for the grant of service connection for residuals of a surgical scar on the left shoulder associated with left shoulder osteoarthritis as it is later than the earliest date of entitlement (May 13, 2003).,The effective date of June 8, 2016 has been assigned for the grant of service connection for major depressive disorder. The effective date of March 11, 2016 has been assigned for the grant of service connection for residuals of a surgical scar on the left shoulder associated with left shoulder osteoarthritis.,The Veteran's left shoulder osteoarthritis is rated at 20% and remains unchanged.,The effective date of April 2, 2019 has been assigned for an increased rating to 50% for major depressive disorder (MDD) and somatic symptom disorder. The effective date of April 2, 2019 has also recharacterized the disability as 'major depressive disorder and somatic symptom disorder'.,The Veteran's MDD and somatic symptom disorder is rated at 70% since April 2, 2019.,A TDIU is remanded.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not support the claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction as it is not related to service.,The earliest communication from the Veteran that can be construed as a claim for major depressive disorder was received on June 8, 2016. The effective date of June 8, 2016 has been assigned for major depressive disorder as it is later than the earliest date of entitlement (April 27, 2016).,The earliest communication from the Veteran that can be construed as a claim for residuals of a surgical scar on his left shoulder was received on March 11, 2016. The effective date of March 11, 2016 has been assigned for the grant of service connection for residuals of a surgical scar on the left shoulder associated with left shoulder osteoarthritis as it is later than the earliest date of entitlement (May 13, 2003).,The effective dates have been assigned based on when the Veteran's claims were received and not necessarily when the disability arose.,The reduction from a 10% rating to a non-compensable rating for palmar psoriasis was proper as there is no evidence of improvement in function or ability to work under ordinary conditions.,An increased rating to 50% for major depressive disorder (MDD) and somatic symptom disorder has been granted effective April 2, 2019. The disability was recharacterized as 'major depressive disorder and somatic symptom disorder'.,A higher rating of 70% for MDD and somatic symptom disorder since April 2, 2019 is remanded.,The Veteran's TDIU claim has been remanded.
- Claimed conditions
- erectile dysfunction, major depressive disorder, residuals of a surgical scar of the left shoulder
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 13, 2020
- Citation
- 20046811
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20046811.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for specially-adapted housing assistance and a special home adaptation grant was denied because he does not meet the criteria for either benefit based on his service-connected disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD and major depressive disorder, is being remanded due to the need for additional development regarding his alleged stressors.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus, prostate cancer, visual impairment, hypertension, and erectile dysfunction due to lack of exposure to herbicide agents during service. The Veteran's claims were not granted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.