The Board denied service connection for glaucoma, bilateral cataracts, and a bilateral shoulder disability (including arthritis). The Veteran's glaucoma is not considered to be related to his military service. His bilateral cataracts are also not considered to be related to his military service as they were first noted years after separation from active duty. The Board found that the Veteran's pre-existing shoulder condition was not aggravated by service and denied service connection for it. Service connection for hypertension was also denied.,The Board denied service connection for glaucoma, bilateral cataracts, a bilateral shoulder disability (including arthritis), and hypertension. The Veteran's glaucoma is not considered to be related to his military service. His bilateral cataracts are also not considered to be related to his military service as they were first noted years after separation from active duty. The Board found that the Veteran's pre-existing shoulder condition was not aggravated by service and denied service connection for it. Service connection for hypertension was also denied.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not show a current disability of glaucoma, bilateral cataracts, or arthritis in the shoulders. The Board found that the Veteran's pre-existing conditions were not aggravated during military service.,The evidence does not show a current disability of glaucoma, bilateral cataracts, or arthritis in the shoulders. The Board found that the Veteran's pre-existing conditions were not aggravated during military service and that hypertension was first noted years after separation from active duty.
- Claimed conditions
- glaucoma, cataracts, bilateral shoulder disability (including arthritis)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 14, 2020
- Citation
- 20047095
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20047095.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's eligibility for PCAFC benefits is remanded due to the AOJ's failure to address whether it is in the best interest of the Veteran to participate in the program. The Board finds that the Veteran has been in need of personal care services for at least six continuous months based on an inability to perform the ADL of bathing.
- Denied
The Veteran's tinnitus and hearing loss claims are denied as there is no current diagnosis of these conditions.,The Veteran's high cholesterol, dementia, stroke, prostate cancer, cataracts, diabetes, hypertension, CHF, and myocardial infarction claims are denied due to lack of service connection evidence or insufficient evidence to establish a nexus between the disabilities and active duty service.,The Veteran was exposed to toxins during his military service but there is no evidence linking these exposures to any of the claimed conditions.
- Dismissed
The appeal for service connection of cataracts has been dismissed due to the appellant's death prior to a Board decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claim for service connection for a bilateral eye condition should be remanded due to pre-decisional duty-to-assist errors and the need for an updated TERA Memorandum. The Veteran was not provided with a VA examination, and her allegations of exposure during basic training were not addressed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.