The Board denied the Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 as there was no evidence supporting an additional disability resulting from the 1974 septoplasty surgery, and the cause of any residual breathing difficulty could not be attributed to VA carelessness or negligence.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the Veteran's breathing difficulties were present prior to the 1974 surgery and continued after it, with no new disability attributable to the procedure.
- Claimed conditions
- Septoplasty
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 16, 2020
- Citation
- 20047690
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20047690.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's need for regular aid and attendance was not due to service-connected disabilities, and therefore special monthly compensation based on the need for regular aid and attendance or being housebound for accrued benefits is denied.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not render him so helpless as to need regular aid and attendance or bedridden, thus denying entitlement to special monthly compensation based on the need for aid and attendance or housebound status.
- Denied
The Veteran's nasal fracture, post-septoplasty, reconstruction and rhinoplasty is rated at the maximum available schedular rating of 10 percent. The claim for a higher rating is denied.
- Denied
The veteran's service-connected nasal septal deviation is currently rated at the maximum schedular evaluation of 10 percent. The Board finds no basis to grant an increased rating as there are no additional symptoms or disabilities associated with his condition that would warrant a higher evaluation.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.