The Board has remanded the case due to the need for further development, including an examination by a clinician to determine if any current neurological conditions are related to the reported in-service concussion.
The deciding factor: The appellant's service treatment records do not contain any indication of treatment he receives for concussion residuals. The examiner should identify all current neurological deficits or symptoms and provide an opinion on whether it is at least as likely as not that any identified disability is causally related to the claimed in-service injury.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a concussion
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 20, 2020
- Citation
- 20048142
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20048142.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection have been remanded due to insufficient evidence of a current disability in some cases and the need for further medical evaluation in others.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board granted service connection for residuals of a concussion, finding that the Veteran's condition had its onset in and is related to his service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded the claim for service connection of residuals of a concussion. The Veteran's claim was denied in December 2022, and the Board is sending it back to the AOJ for further action.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for residuals of a concussion and nerve impingement of the right upper extremity, finding that there was no credible evidence linking these conditions to active duty service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.