The Board has remanded the case due to a need for additional medical opinions regarding the Veteran's memory loss disorder.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner was unable to provide an opinion on the relationship between the Veteran's service and his memory loss disorder, as it is outside her area of expertise.
- Claimed conditions
- Memory loss disorder
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 24, 2020
- Citation
- 20049556
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20049556.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, claimed as PTSD; a memory loss disorder; and substance and alcohol use disorder. The Veteran's claims were not supported by credible evidence of in-service stressors or other medical findings.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied a compensable initial disability rating for left ear hearing loss and remanded the issues of service connection for memory loss disorder, sleep disorder (including sleep apnea), eye disorder, thyroid disorder, and left shoulder disorder. The appeal is now pending again with the AOJ.
- Denied
The Board has denied service connection for memory loss, sleep, and fatigue disorders as the evidence does not show current diagnoses of these conditions separate from service-connected PTSD.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims of service connection for memory loss disorder and back disorder due to inadequate rationale in previous decisions, lack of VA examinations addressing concerns raised by a Joint Motion for Partial Remand (JMPR), and failure to provide adequate notice of scheduled VA examinations.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.