Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's PTSD with MDD disability is remanded for a new VA examination to assess the current severity of his symptoms.,The Veteran's chronic sinusitis is remanded due to insufficient evidence addressing whether it is related to burn pit exposure while serving overseas.,The Veteran's obstructive sleep apnea is remanded as there was no opinion regarding its relationship to PTSD with MDD and/or service-connected conditions, including burn pit exposure.,The Veteran's cervical spine disability is remanded for a VA examination to determine if it had its onset in service or is otherwise related to active service.,The Veteran's peripheral neuropathy of the left and right upper extremities is remanded as there was no opinion regarding whether it is related to PTSD with MDD.

The deciding factor: The Board found that the November 2018 decision did not fully address the severity, frequency, and duration of the Veteran’s PTSD with MDD symptoms.,There were insufficient VA examinations addressing chronic sinusitis due to burn pit exposure while serving overseas.,VA examiners did not provide an opinion regarding whether the Veteran's obstructive sleep apnea is secondary to PTSD with MDD or aggravated by service-connected conditions, including obesity caused by PTSD with MDD.,The Board found that a VA examination was needed to determine if the Veteran’s cervical spine disability had its onset in service or is otherwise related to active service.,There was no opinion regarding whether the Veteran's peripheral neuropathy of the left and right upper extremities is related to PTSD with MDD.

Claimed conditions
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Chronic Sinusitis, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Cervical Spine Disability, Peripheral Neuropathy of the Left and Right Upper Extremities
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 28, 2020
Citation
20050192

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20050192.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.