The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for right and left foot disabilities due to insufficient evidence supporting the determinations. The case will be returned for further development.
The deciding factor: The Board found that additional evidentiary development is necessary prior to adjudicating the Veteran’s claims of entitlement to compensable disability ratings for right and left foot disabilities.
- Claimed conditions
- Right Foot Disability (Pes Planus), Left Foot Disability (Pes Planus)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 3, 2020
- Citation
- 20051229
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20051229.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's ED is caused by medications taken to treat his service-connected lumbosacral strain disability. The Board grants service connection for ED on a secondary basis.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's service connection claims for his bilateral hip, low back, left shoulder, and bilateral foot disabilities due to incomplete development of records and inadequate medical opinions.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a right foot disability, lumbar spine disability, and cervical spine disability. The decision found that the Veteran's right foot disability was not aggravated during service beyond its natural progression, and there is no evidence of a nexus between his current back and neck disabilities and service.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.