The Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral upper and lower extremity conditions, including as due to Agent Orange exposure, are remanded due to the need for additional development.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner did not provide sufficient rationale regarding the current diagnoses of peripheral neuropathy in the Veteran’s bilateral upper and lower extremities, and further examination is needed to address the Veteran's service treatment records and early-onset peripheral neuropathy.
- Claimed conditions
- left upper extremity condition, right upper extremity condition, left lower extremity condition, right lower extremity condition
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 7, 2020
- Citation
- 20052530
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20052530.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has identified errors in the original decision and remands all claims for further development, including consideration of potential PACT Act exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's left lower extremity condition, including a heel drop due to nerve impingement in his back and atrophy in his left calf, is currently rated 10 percent disabling. The Board has remanded the case for further examination and reconsideration of diagnostic codes.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's conditions. The Veteran is required to undergo further examinations and provide updated medical opinions.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's application for VA educational assistance benefits under Chapter 30 was denied because he did not meet the service requirements for eligibility, specifically due to his uncharacterized discharge from active duty.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.