The Veteran's hypertension with chronic kidney disease and voiding dysfunction is rated at 60 percent prior to August 1, 2013, and 80 percent since. The Veteran does not meet the criteria for a higher rating under these diagnostic codes.,For his CVA, the Veteran has been assigned ratings of 40 percent for voiding dysfunction, 10 percent each for bilateral cranial nerve X speech impediment and bilateral cranial nerve IX speech impediment.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not show persistent edema or albuminuria with BUN 40 to 80mg%; or creatinine 4 to 8mg%; or generalized poor health characterized by lethargy, weakness, anorexia, weight loss, or limitation of exertion. The Veteran's kidney disease and hypertension are rated based on their association.,The evidence does not show the Veteran requires more than sedentary activity from persistent edema and albuminuria; BUN more than 80mg%; or creatinine more than 8mg%. His ratings for CVA with voiding dysfunction, speech impediment to cranial nerve X, and speech impediment to cranial nerve IX are based on the severity of his symptoms.
- Claimed conditions
- Hypertension with chronic kidney disease and voiding dysfunction, Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with voiding dysfunction, Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with impairment to bilateral cranial nerve X speech impediment, Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with impairment to bilateral cranial nerve IX speech impediment
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 13, 2020
- Citation
- 20053689
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20053689.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD is granted as the evidence shows a current diagnosis of PTSD, an in-service stressor, and a medical link between the two.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.