Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's appeal for an initial rating in excess of 10 percent prior to September 5, 2019 and in excess of 20 percent from September 5, 2019 for right upper extremity polyneuropathy with right ulnar neuropathy is remanded due to the need for clarification regarding whether the right wrist contracture is a manifestation of the service-connected condition.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for heart disease, to include as due to in-service herbicide agent exposure, is remanded due to uncertainty about his diagnosis of ischemic heart disease and the need for an addendum opinion from a clinician who possesses experience in diagnosing cardiac disabilities.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for left upper extremity neuropathy, to include as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus, left lower extremity neuropathy, to include as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus, and right lower extremity neuropathy, to include as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus, are remanded due to the need for an addendum opinion from a clinician who possesses experience in diagnosing peripheral neuropathies.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for left upper extremity neuropathy, to include as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus, left lower extremity neuropathy, to include as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus, and right lower extremity neuropathy, to include as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus, are remanded due to the need for an addendum opinion from a clinician who possesses experience in diagnosing peripheral neuropathies.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for left upper extremity neuropathy, to include as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus, left lower extremity neuropathy, to include as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus, and right lower extremity neuropathy, to include as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus, are remanded due to the need for an addendum opinion from a clinician who possesses experience in diagnosing peripheral neuropathies.

The deciding factor: The Board finds that further clarification is needed regarding whether the right wrist contracture is a manifestation of the service-connected condition.,The Board finds uncertainty about the Veteran's diagnosis of ischemic heart disease and requires an addendum opinion from a clinician who possesses experience in diagnosing cardiac disabilities to determine if he has this condition.,The Board finds inconsistencies in the record regarding the etiology of the Veteran’s peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities and requires an additional medical opinion to determine its cause.,The Board finds inconsistencies in the record regarding the etiology of the Veteran’s peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities and requires an additional medical opinion to determine its cause.,The Board finds inconsistencies in the record regarding the etiology of the Veteran’s peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities and requires an additional medical opinion to determine its cause.

Claimed conditions
right upper extremity polyneuropathy with right ulnar neuropathy, heart disease (ischemic heart disease), left upper extremity neuropathy, left lower extremity neuropathy, right lower extremity neuropathy
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 24, 2020
Citation
20055906

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20055906.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.