The Veteran's skin disorder, including chronic dermatitis with tinea pedis and an undiagnosed condition, is being remanded for a new VA examination to assess the current severity of his service-connected skin disorders.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the most recent VA examination was several years old and recommended scheduling the examination during a flare-up of the Veteran's skin disorder.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic dermatitis with tinea pedis, undiagnosed condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 27, 2020
- Citation
- 20056761
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20056761.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's chronic dermatitis with tinea pedis is currently rated at 60 percent, which is the highest available rating under the applicable criteria. The Board found that no higher rating was warranted as there were no symptoms or conditions not already accounted for by the current rating.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for a higher rating for his service-connected chronic dermatitis with tinea pedis and undiagnosed condition due to insufficient evidence regarding the extent of his skin disability during active phases.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for chronic dermatitis with tinea pedis and undiagnosed condition prior to March 15, 2021 is denied as the evidence does not show that his skin condition affected more than 40 percent of his entire body or exposed areas, nor did it require constant systemic therapy.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.