Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's right ankle condition is rated at 10 percent, and the Board has remanded for further examination to determine if it warrants a higher rating.,Service connection for left lower peripheral neuropathy due to herbicide agent exposure and secondary to service-connected right ankle condition is denied. The Veteran's bilateral lower peripheral neuropathy is not presumed to be related to his in-service herbicide exposure, but the Board has remanded for further examination to determine if it is proximately due to or the result of his service-connected right ankle condition.,Service connection for right lower peripheral neuropathy due to herbicide agent exposure and secondary to service-connected right ankle condition is denied. The Veteran's bilateral lower peripheral neuropathy is not presumed to be related to his in-service herbicide exposure, but the Board has remanded for further examination to determine if it is proximately due to or the result of his service-connected right ankle condition.

The deciding factor: The evidence does not support a finding that the Veteran's right ankle condition warrants a higher rating.,The VA examiner did not address whether the Veteran’s bilateral lower peripheral neuropathy was aggravated by his service-connected right ankle condition, and therefore further examination is needed to determine if it is proximately due to or the result of his service-connected right ankle condition.,The evidence does not support a finding that the Veteran's right lower peripheral neuropathy warrants a higher rating.

Claimed conditions
Right Ankle Condition, Left Lower Peripheral Neuropathy, Right Lower Peripheral Neuropathy
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 27, 2020
Citation
20056787

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20056787.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.