The Board has decided to remand the case due to the need for a VA medical examination to determine if the appellant's current chronic atrial fibrillation is related to his active service.
The deciding factor: The decision was made based on the need for further evaluation and opinion regarding the etiology of the appellant's current condition.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic atrial fibrillation
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 1, 2020
- Citation
- 20057899
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20057899.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for the cause of death and burial benefits due to a lack of medical opinion regarding the Veteran's exposure at Camp Lejeune, which could impact his eligibility for these benefits.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the matter to obtain a TERA opinion and relevant treatment records as part of the duty to assist.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has reopened the claim for service connection for ischemic heart disease and remanded other issues related to heart disability, respiratory disability, colorectal cancer, peripheral neuropathy of the upper extremities, SMC based on need for aid and attendance or housebound status, TDIU, and basic eligibility for DEA.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's cause of death was listed as cardiac arrest, but the Board is remanding to determine if his coronary artery disease, chronic atrial fibrillation, and congestive heart failure were a contributory cause. The VA examiner's opinion was inadequate, and an addendum from a cardiologist is needed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.