The Board has remanded the cases for further examination and opinion regarding service connection due to insufficient evidence in some areas.
The deciding factor: Further medical evaluation is needed as the current examinations are inadequate or incomplete, particularly concerning the etiology of the Veteran's conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- vascular condition of the bilateral lower extremities, bilateral skin condition of the lower extremities (tinea changes), residuals of traumatic brain injury (headaches and short-term memory loss)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 2, 2020
- Citation
- 20058255
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20058255.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus type II and vascular conditions of the bilateral lower extremities as secondary to diabetes mellitus II. The Board found that there was no evidence of herbicide exposure during service, which is required for presumptive service connection under VA regulations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including a left knee disability and heart disabilities. However, these claims are still pending as further medical examination is needed to determine if there is a relationship between the current diagnoses and service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded several issues related to service connection for various conditions, including diabetes, neuropathy, erectile dysfunction, and vascular condition. The claims are being returned for additional development of medical records from the Grand Island VA Medical Center.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.