Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's cervical spine condition is remanded due to the inadequacy of the September 2017 VA examination.,The Veteran's left knee condition is remanded due to the inadequacy of the September 2017 VA examination.,The Veteran's right thumb and left thumb conditions are remanded for clarification of diagnosis and determination of service connection.,The Veteran's right shoulder condition is remanded for an addendum opinion on its relationship to service.

The deciding factor: The September 2017 VA examination relied on inaccurate factual background, failed to consider the Veteran’s lay statements regarding in-service injuries and subsequent symptoms, and did not address all pertinent evidence of record.,The September 2017 VA examination was inadequate as it did not provide a rationale for its opinion based solely on the lack of evidence of fractures or tears of meniscus or ligaments without addressing other relevant medical history.,The September 2017 VA examination failed to address the Veteran’s lay statements regarding in-service injuries and subsequent symptoms, and provided an incomplete explanation for why there was no link between service and his current condition.,The September 2017 VA examination did not provide a rationale based on all pertinent evidence of record, including the Veteran's STRs indicating upper back pain and his military personnel record noting parachute badge.

Claimed conditions
Degenerative arthritis of cervical spine, Left knee osteoarthritis, Right thumb degenerative arthritis, Left thumb degenerative arthritis, Right shoulder degenerative arthritis
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
September 9, 2020
Citation
20059277

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20059277.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.