The Veteran's initial claim for an increased rating for coronary artery disease (CAD) was denied, and the Board has remanded the issues of service connection for peripheral neuropathy of both lower extremities.,Service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity is remanded due to inadequate medical opinion regarding herbicide exposure.,Service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity is also remanded due to inadequate medical opinion regarding herbicide exposure.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's CAD was currently rated as 30 percent disabling, and the Board has found that a higher rating is not warranted based on the evidence.,Service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity requires an opinion addressing whether it is related to herbicide exposure during service. The current VA opinion did not address this aspect.,Service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity also requires an opinion regarding herbicide exposure, and the current VA opinion was inadequate.
- Claimed conditions
- Coronary artery disease (CAD), Peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity, Peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 15, 2020
- Citation
- 20060592
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20060592.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for SMC based on aid and attendance from June 1, 2011, to May 24, 2017, finding that his need for regular aid and attendance was not established during this period.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's current coronary artery disease with acute, subacute, or old myocardial infarction with coronary stent is being remanded for further evaluation due to the lack of a medical nexus between his service-connected hypertension and his heart condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service connection claims for coronary artery disease and obstructive sleep apnea have been denied as there is no evidence of a nexus between the conditions and his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found new and relevant evidence for the claims of service connection for coronary artery disease (CAD) and an acquired psychiatric disorder. The AOJ is required to readjudicate these claims, taking into consideration all submitted evidence.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.