The Board has ordered remand due to inadequate opinions regarding the Veteran's prostate and low testosterone disabilities. The VA examiners did not provide sufficient rationale for their negative opinions on direct service connection or secondary service connection.
The deciding factor: The VA examiners' opinions were insufficient as they relied solely on unremarkable STRs and lack of listed presumptive diseases without providing a reasoned discussion of the Veteran's exposure to herbicide agents and his reports of groin pressure during parachute jumps.
- Claimed conditions
- prostate disability, low testosterone
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 22, 2020
- Citation
- 20062229
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20062229.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the Veteran's prostate disability. The claims for esophageal cancer and Barrett's esophagus remain denied.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim for service connection for BPH due to insufficient evidence regarding its relationship to his service-connected hypertension. The AOJ is instructed to obtain a medical opinion addressing whether BPH was caused or aggravated by his hypertension.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating for residuals of prostate cancer status post transurethral resection is remanded due to the need for additional private treatment records.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for residuals of a kidney removal and prostate disability due to incomplete VA medical opinions regarding exposure to toxic substances at Fort Ord. The claim for service connection for rheumatoid arthritis remains denied.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.