Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's right lower extremity radiculopathy is rated at 20 percent before July 23, 2018 and in excess of 20 percent from July 23, 2018. The Board has decided that the Veteran is not entitled to a higher rating for this condition.,The Veteran's lumbar spine disability is rated at 40 percent. The Board has decided that the Veteran is not entitled to an increased rating for this condition.,The Veteran's implanted cardiac pacemaker and his disability manifested by fatigue are both remanded due to inadequate examinations in previous decisions.,The Veteran's service connection claims for an implanted cardiac pacemaker and a disability manifested by fatigue are also remanded.

The deciding factor: The Board found that the evidence did not reflect moderately severe incomplete paralysis, which is required for a higher rating of 40 percent. The Veteran only exhibited moderate intermittent pain, constant pain, and numbness.,The VA spine examinations were inadequate as they failed to quantify the functional impact of flare-ups in terms of lost range of motion or explain why it was not possible despite available data.,The Board found that the August 2015 examination did not provide a rationale for finding the Veteran's cardiovascular disorder non-ischemic and whether it was related to military service on a direct basis. The Court requested clarification regarding ischemic nature and herbicide exposure as potential causes.,The September 2015 VA examination only addressed chronic fatigue syndrome, but did not adequately address the relevant medical history of the Veteran's disability manifested by body weakness and fatigue.

Claimed conditions
Right lower extremity radiculopathy, Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Lumbar spine disability, Implanted cardiac pacemaker, Fatigue
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
September 23, 2020
Citation
20062539

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20062539.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.