Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's bilateral pes planus was present before service and not aggravated by or during service, thus denying service connection.,There is no evidence that the Veteran’s lumbar spine disability is secondary to his service-connected costochondritis. The Board finds it unrelated to service on a direct basis as well.,Similarly, there is no evidence that the Veteran's right hip and left hip disabilities are secondary to his service-connected costochondritis or related to in-service injury. They are found not to be related to service.,The Veteran’s heart disability was denied due to lack of medical evidence linking it to service-connected costochondritis.,TDIU claim is denied as the preponderance of the evidence does not support a finding that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities prevent him from securing and following a substantially gainful occupation.

The deciding factor: The Board found no evidence showing bilateral pes planus was aggravated by or during service, thus denying service connection.,There is no medical evidence linking the lumbar spine disability to service-connected costochondritis. The VA examiner concluded it was unrelated to service on a direct basis as well.,VA examiners provided negative opinions that the hip disabilities are not secondary to service-connected costochondritis or related to in-service injury, and found them unrelated to service.,The Veteran's heart disability was denied due to lack of medical evidence linking it to service-connected costochondritis. The VA examiner concluded there is no relation between 1976 chest pain and current cardiac diagnosis based on the unrelated etiology of the two conditions.,VA examiners found that the Veteran’s strong risk factors for a heart disability are unrelated to his service-connected costochondritis, thus denying TDIU.

Claimed conditions
bilateral pes planus, lumbar spine disability, right hip disability, left hip disability, heart disability
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
September 23, 2020
Citation
20062569

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20062569.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.