The Board has decided to remand the case due to an inadequate VA examination, requiring a new one for clarification of the etiology of the Veteran's liver condition.
The deciding factor: The October 2019 VA opinion is inadequate as it does not provide a clear explanation of why the Veteran’s liver condition is not related to his consumption of Isoniazid and/or Rifampin.
- Claimed conditions
- Liver condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 23, 2020
- Citation
- 20062583
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20062583.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a liver condition was denied in an August 1978 rating decision. The Board found that the evidence did not show any current residuals of the liver condition from service and that his current symptoms were unrelated to his service.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's liver condition is found to be proximately due to his service-connected PTSD, and thus service connection for the liver condition as secondary to PTSD is granted.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Board dismissed the application to readjudicate the previously denied claim of entitlement to service connection for a liver condition. The application to readjudicate the previously denied claim of entitlement to service connection for IBS is granted, but the Veteran's claim for IBS is denied as there is no current diagnosis.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the service connection claim for a liver condition due to insufficient evidence regarding its etiology, specifically requiring an additional VA examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.