The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for a compensable rating for service-connected retropatellar pain syndrome, right and left knees prior to February 28, 2013, and ratings in excess of 10 percent thereafter. The case is being returned to the RO for additional development.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the current VA examination was inadequate as it did not include all required range of motion testing results and discussed why such would be medically contraindicated.
- Claimed conditions
- retropatellar pain syndrome, right knee, retropatellar pain syndrome, left knee
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 25, 2020
- Citation
- 20063211
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20063211.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for bilateral knee conditions as additional evidence and an inadequate medical opinion require further development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and earlier effective dates are being remanded due to inadequate examinations. The left knee and back disabilities need further evaluation.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection, increased rating, and TDIU as they are inextricably intertwined with her secondary service connection claim. The Veteran is to be scheduled for a VA examination to assess the severity of her right knee disabilities and an addendum opinion regarding her cervical strain.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for additional development due to inadequate musculoskeletal examinations.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.