The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to the death of the appellant, and no service connection decision was made.
The deciding factor: The appellant died during the pendency of the appeal, thus the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this appeal at this time.
- Claimed conditions
- tumor on adrenal gland, complications
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 28, 2020
- Citation
- 20063353
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20063353.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that there was a pre-decisional duty to assist error in not associating the Veteran's service treatment records with the claims file, and therefore the Board is unable to decide the issues currently on appeal. The Board also finds that remand for development of a longitudinal exposure record (ILER) and a TERA opinion is necessary.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran seeks compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for left hip surgery performed in July 2009 at the Portland VA Medical Center. The case is being remanded to allow consideration of newly received medical evidence and to issue a supplemental statement of the case.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's AIH, status post liver transplant with complications and secondary conditions is related to his service, specifically his presumed exposure to Agent Orange. As a result, the claim for service connection is granted.
- Denied
The Board found that the veteran's reported symptoms of headaches, fatigue, joint pain, and vision disturbances have been attributed by medical evidence to a known clinical diagnosis of CNS vasculitis with a left occipital infarct and complications. The Board concluded that service connection for these conditions was not warranted as they were not incurred in or aggravated during active service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.