Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for service connection for shin splints has been denied as there is no current diagnosis or treatment for the condition.,Barrett's esophagus and hepatitis C are remanded due to insufficient evidence regarding their relationship to service, with a request for an addendum opinion from VA.,PTSD and other acquired psychiatric disorders are also remanded, requiring an addendum opinion on whether they were incurred in or caused by service.

The deciding factor: The preponderance of the evidence does not support a current diagnosis of shin splints. The Veteran's lower leg condition is attributed to diabetes.,VA opinions did not address the Veteran’s claims regarding exposure to contaminated water at Camp LeJeune, and hepatitis C was diagnosed after service. An addendum opinion is needed to determine if these conditions are related to service.,PTSD and other acquired psychiatric disorders were not diagnosed in service or linked to service stressors. The examiner noted that PTSD did not meet diagnostic criteria under DSM-5.

Claimed conditions
shin splints, Barrett's esophagus, hepatitis C, an acquired psychiatric disorder (including PTSD)
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 14, 2020
Citation
20066454

Veterans Law Judge

MICHAEL D. LYON

Decisions by this judge: 2,642 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20066454.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.