The Board has remanded the case due to failure to adjudicate an intertwined issue of service connection for degenerative bone disease due to ionizing radiation. The SMC based on need for aid and attendance claim is also being remanded.
The deciding factor: The RO failed to address the intertwined issue of service connection for degenerative bone disease due to ionizing radiation in the June 2020 supplemental statement of the case (SSOC).
- Claimed conditions
- degenerative bone disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 19, 2020
- Citation
- 20067610
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,287 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20067610.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim to reopen his service connection for degenerative bone disease is granted. The case is remanded for further development, including a VA examination.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for various conditions, including sciatica, back disability, right hip and knee disabilities, cold injury residuals, PTSD, chronic sinusitis, chronic fatigue syndrome, skin disorder of the feet, fibromyalgia, stroke with left-side balance impairment, headaches (migraines), degenerative bone disease, heart disability, muscle pain and soreness, and a left eye disability. The Board found no evidence to support these claims.
- Dismissed
The Board has dismissed the appeals for service connection for sleep apnea, gout, degenerative bone disease, and allergic rhinitis (claimed as allergies) due to the appellant's withdrawal of his appeal.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical evidence regarding the nature, etiology, and current state of the Veteran's claimed arthritis disability. The Veteran should be provided with a VA examination to determine if his arthritis is related to service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.