Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's appeals for a rating in excess of 30 percent for migraine headaches prior to February 8, 2017, an initial compensable evaluation for laparoscopy scars, and SMC based on loss of use of a creative organ have been dismissed.,The Veteran's appeals for whether new and material evidence exists to reopen her previously denied claims for service connection for left ovary removal, ovary cyst removal, and cervical dysplasia have also been dismissed.,The Board has remanded the issues regarding service connection for a left knee disability (secondary to lumbosacral strain with degenerative changes) and a right knee disability (secondary to lumbosacral strain with degenerative changes).,The Veteran's claim for service connection for fibromyalgia is also being remanded.

The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew her appeals regarding the issues of migraine headaches, laparoscopy scars, SMC, ovary removal, ovary cyst removal, and cervical dysplasia in February 2019.,The Board found that there was insufficient evidence to support a direct service connection for the knee disabilities or fibromyalgia. The Veteran's current diagnoses and her in-service complaints regarding muscular pain were considered.,The remanded issues include obtaining STRs, VA treatment records, and an examination to determine if the knee disabilities are related to service, as well as whether fibromyalgia is related to service.

Claimed conditions
migraine headaches, left knee disability, right knee disability, fibromyalgia
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 23, 2020
Citation
20068729

Veterans Law Judge

DAVID A. BRENNINGMEYER

Decisions by this judge: 1,757 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20068729.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.