Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Board restored the Veteran's previous 10% rating for service-connected hypertension, finding that the reduction from April 2015 was improper due to insufficient evidence of improvement in the disability.

The deciding factor: The preponderance of the evidence did not support a finding of improvement in the Veteran’s hypertension during the period on appeal.

Claimed conditions
hypertension
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
10%
Decision date
October 26, 2020
Citation
20069244

Veterans Law Judge

Joshua Castillo

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20069244.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.