The Board denied a compensable initial rating for the Veteran's asymptomatic pulmonary granuloma, finding that there is no evidence of current functional impairment.
The deciding factor: The preponderance of the evidence showed that the Veteran’s left lung granuloma was asymptomatic and stable without any current residuals or functional impairment.
- Claimed conditions
- pulmonary granuloma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 27, 2020
- Citation
- 20069316
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,451 · Granted: 22% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20069316.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Board dismissed the Veteran's appeals for service connection for foot pain and pulmonary granuloma due to concurrent election of Higher-Level Review and Direct Review.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current pulmonary conditions, including COPD and chronic bronchitis, are not linked to his service, specifically the episode of pneumonia during active duty. The medical opinions provided by VA physicians do not support a link between these conditions and his in-service respiratory issues.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to incomplete evidence and need for further medical evaluation.
- Whole decision: Denied
The VA determined that the Veteran's respiratory disorder is not related to his military service, including exposure to asbestos. The Board concurs with this determination based on the lack of evidence linking the current condition to service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.