Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Veteran's hypertension is rated at 10 percent, and the Board found no evidence to warrant a higher rating.,The Veteran's thoracic osteoarthritis is currently rated at 20 percent. The Board determined that the disability does not meet or approximate criteria for a higher rating under any applicable diagnostic code.,The Veteran was granted separate ratings of 10 percent each for peripheral neuropathy of the right and left lower extremities, as his symptoms are analogous to mild incomplete paralysis of the femoral nerve.,Service connection for diabetes mellitus was denied due to lack of evidence showing chronicity in service or continuity of symptomatology post-service.,The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is not considered service-connected.

The deciding factor: There was no evidence that the Veteran’s hypertension warranted a rating higher than 10 percent, as his blood pressure readings did not consistently meet the criteria for a higher rating under Diagnostic Code 7101.,The medical records and VA examinations showed that the Veteran's thoracic osteoarthritis had limited range of motion but no ankylosis or other severe impairment. The Board found that the disability did not warrant a higher rating based on these findings alone.,The evidence supported separate ratings for peripheral neuropathy, as his symptoms were analogous to mild incomplete paralysis of the femoral nerve.,There was insufficient evidence to establish service connection for diabetes mellitus due to lack of chronicity in service or continuity of symptomatology post-service.,Service connection could not be established for diabetes mellitus.

Claimed conditions
Hypertension, Thoracic osteoarthritis, Peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity (femoral nerve), Peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity (femoral nerve), Diabetes mellitus, type II
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
October 27, 2020
Citation
20069538

Veterans Law Judge

Caroline Fleming

Decisions by this judge: 105 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20069538.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.