The Veteran's left second and third toes had active osteomyelitis from May 1, 2011 to November 7, 2011. The rating of 10 percent is granted for this period.
The deciding factor: Active osteomyelitis was noted in the medical records prior to amputation and continued after amputation until a more recent examination where no active signs or findings were present but phantom pain persisted.
- Claimed conditions
- Osteomyelitis, Diabetic Foot Ulcer
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- October 28, 2020
- Citation
- 20070027
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,062 · Granted: 34% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20070027.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, hypertension, and compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for osteomyelitis to correct pre-decisional duty to assist errors.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to unresolved medical questions and potential negligence in post-operative care, which may affect the claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151.
- Denied
The Board has denied the claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, finding that no disability resulting from injury or disease incurred in or aggravated by service contributed substantially or materially to his death.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that another remand is necessary to obtain an addendum opinion from a qualified endocrinologist and thoracic surgeon/cardiologist regarding the Veteran's contentions about diabetes management, UTI treatment, and stent use. The claim will be readjudicated after this additional development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.