The Veteran's claims for initial ratings in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected patellofemoral pain syndrome of the right and left knees are being remanded due to inadequate examination reports.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner did not comply with the requirements set forth in Sharp v. Shulkin, specifically regarding the assessment of additional limitation of motion during flare-ups and repetitive use.
- Claimed conditions
- patellofemoral pain syndrome
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 30, 2020
- Citation
- 20070558
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for a right knee disability, finding that the Veteran's pre-existing condition was aggravated during active service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for increased ratings and TDIU due to duty-to-assist errors that occurred prior to the October 2023 and February 2024 rating decisions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a right knee condition to obtain an adequate medical nexus opinion.
- Dismissed
The appeal was dismissed due to the Veteran's failure to follow VA's claims processing rules.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.