The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for appendicitis, peritonitis, and bowel perforation as secondary to his service-connected residuals of duodenal ulcer, status post Billroth II, partial gastrectomy and vagotomy with pyloroplasty with GERD and esophageal stricture. The Board also remanded the Veteran's claim for a TDIU rating.
The deciding factor: The claims are inextricably intertwined as they may have an impact on each other.
- Claimed conditions
- appendicitis, peritonitis, bowel perforation
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 30, 2020
- Citation
- 20070692
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,911 · Granted: 10% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20070692.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's child is not eligible for VA benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1805 for spina bifida because the evidence does not support a diagnosis of this condition.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for additional medical opinions to address whether the Veteran's appendicitis and cholecystitis are related to VA treatment in November/December 2011, including any fault or negligence on the part of VA.
- Denied
The Veteran's children are not eligible for DIC benefits or a survivor's pension because the appellant does not meet VA's definition of 'child' and the Veteran did not serve during a period of war.
- Denied
The Veteran's bowel perforation following a colonoscopy was not deemed to be caused by VA carelessness, negligence, or error in judgment. The Board found that the event did not result from an unforeseeable event.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.