The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection and secondary service connection for a bilateral lower extremity disability, finding that there was no medical evidence to support her contention that her disability was related to her active duty service or her service-connected left ankle disability.
The deciding factor: The VA examiners' opinions were against the claim, concluding that the Veteran's claimed bilateral lower extremity disability was not related to her military service or her service-connected left ankle disability.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral lower extremity disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 30, 2020
- Citation
- 20070693
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,287 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20070693.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for bilateral lower extremity disability and abdominal disability due to incomplete records from the Veteran's National Guard service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for various disabilities, including hernia, bilateral knee disability, bilateral foot disability, low back disability, bilateral lower extremity disability, and bilateral eye disability, due to a failure to notify the Veteran of the inability to obtain his private treatment records.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings were denied as she failed to report for scheduled VA examinations without good cause.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded all issues to obtain new medical opinions on the veteran's service connection claims.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.