Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's heart disorder is denied as there is no evidence of a pre-existing condition prior to his death.,The Veteran's left knee disorder is remanded for additional development due to insufficient rationale in the previous VA examination.,The Veteran's hypertension is remanded because the medical opinion did not adequately address whether it was caused by or aggravated by service-connected diabetes mellitus and/or herbicide exposure.,The Veteran's kidney disorder is remanded as there is no evidence of a pre-existing condition prior to his death.,The Veteran's thyroid disorder is remanded due to insufficient rationale in the previous VA opinion regarding its relationship with service-connected diabetes mellitus.

The deciding factor: There was no diagnosis of heart disorder prior to the Veteran’s death, and the medical evidence does not support a finding that it began during service or was related to an injury, event, or disease.,The VA examiner did not provide adequate rationale for why the popping and locking of the knees in service could not be etiologically related to later diagnosed degenerative joint disease.,The hypertension opinion did not adequately address whether it was caused by or aggravated by service-connected diabetes mellitus and/or herbicide exposure, nor did it explain if the Veteran's service-connected diabetes may have aggravated a thyroid disorder.,There is no evidence of a pre-existing kidney condition prior to the Veteran’s death. The medical opinion found that the Veteran had normal renal function at his last examination.,The VA opinion did not provide adequate rationale for why there was no causal relationship between service-connected diabetes and goiters, nor did it explain if the Veteran's service-connected diabetes may have aggravated a thyroid disorder.

Claimed conditions
Heart disorder, Left knee disorder, Hypertension, Kidney disorder, Thyroid disorder
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 3, 2020
Citation
20070820

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20070820.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.