Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claims for increased rating and service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and medical opinions.,The claim for sleep apnea is being remanded as there was insufficient consideration of the Veteran’s in-service symptoms and post-deployment treatment history, along with his current testimony about gasping for air during sleep.,The claim for headaches is being remanded due to the lack of a clear opinion regarding whether the Veteran's headaches are related to Gulf War service or an undiagnosed illness.,The claim for allergic rhinitis is being remanded because there was no examination addressing the potential link between the condition and Gulf War service.

The deciding factor: There were insufficient considerations of the Veteran’s in-service symptoms, post-deployment treatment history, and current testimony regarding his sleep apnea.,The examiner did not consider the Veteran's in-service symptoms and post-deployment treatment history when forming an opinion on whether his sleep apnea is related to service-connected PTSD.,There was no examination addressing the potential link between the Veteran’s allergic rhinitis and Gulf War service, despite the Veteran's assertions of exposure during deployment.,The examiner did not consider the Veteran's in-service symptoms and post-deployment treatment history when forming an opinion on whether his sleep apnea is related to service-connected PTSD.

Claimed conditions
low back strain, sleep apnea, headaches, allergic rhinitis with nasal polyp
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 5, 2020
Citation
20071696

Veterans Law Judge

LESLEY A. REIN

Decisions by this judge: 2,240 · Granted: 28% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20071696.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.