The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether the Veteran's porphyria cutanea tarda is related to service, including as due to herbicide exposure. The Veteran needs to provide private treatment records and a VA examination.
The deciding factor: Insufficient evidence exists to determine if the Veteran's PCT is related to service or herbicide exposure.
- Claimed conditions
- porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT)
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 5, 2020
- Citation
- 20071714
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,911 · Granted: 10% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20071714.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for the Veteran's skin disability, including seborrheic dermatitis of the face and porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT), based on exposure to herbicide agents during his military service in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection was denied because the Board Appeal request was not timely filed, and good cause has not been shown to accept a late filing.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for CAD, DMII, PCT, bilateral lower extremity neuropathy as secondary to DMII, and stroke as secondary to DMII due to a lack of consideration on the merits.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's appeal was granted for the purchase of a 20 foot x 28 foot heated, ADA-compliant greenhouse on concrete grade with indoor lights, 4 electrical outlets, 4 water bibs, and a hydroponic system. The decision is based on mutual agreement between the Veteran and his former counselor in April 2017.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.