The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for loss of visual acuity as there is no evidence of a current eye disability other than hyperopia with astigmatism, which is considered a congenital defect and cannot be service connected. The Veteran did not have any eye injuries in service.
The deciding factor: There was no superimposed disease or injury during military service that created additional disability for the congenital defect of hyperopia with astigmatism.
- Claimed conditions
- loss of visual acuity, hyperopia with astigmatism
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 24, 2020
- Citation
- 20075029
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,185 · Granted: 28% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20075029.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for chronic rhinitis and sarcoidosis was dismissed. The appeals for erectile dysfunction, skin condition, scar, fibromyalgia, headaches, bilateral hearing loss, CFS, dental abscess, visual acuity, memory loss condition, myocardial infraction, cardiovascular disease, sleep apnea, and diabetes mellitus were all dismissed.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for an additional disability of loss of visual acuity and a failed corneal transplant, as a result of eye surgeries performed by VA in 2014, due to improper development by the AOJ.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for loss of visual acuity, finding that the evidence does not support a link between the condition and his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical opinion regarding the cause of the Veteran's loss of visual acuity during service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.