Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's diabetic retinopathy resulted in minimal visual impairment, with corrected distance vision of 20/40 bilaterally. The Board found that the constricted visual fields were not related to his service-connected type II diabetes mellitus or diabetic retinopathy.

The deciding factor: The VA examiner opined that the Veteran's constricted visual fields are less likely due to his diabetic retinopathy and more consistent with dermatochalasis, a condition unrelated to his service connection.

Claimed conditions
Diabetic Retinopathy
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
0%
Decision date
November 24, 2020
Citation
20075241

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20075241.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.