The Veteran's lumbar spine disability is rated at 20 percent, and his right lower extremity radiculopathy was granted a rating of 10 percent from April 3, 2014 to December 18, 2017. From December 19, 2017 to March 4, 2019, the Veteran's right lower extremity radiculopathy was denied any higher rating than 10 percent. Beginning March 5, 2019, a rating of 40 percent for his right lower extremity radiculopathy is granted. The left lower extremity radiculopathy received ratings from April 3, 2014 to February 8, 2015 (10 percent), and beginning May 8, 2015, a rating of 40 percent.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's lumbar spine disability met the criteria for a 20 percent rating based on forward flexion greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees and combined range of motion greater than 120 degrees but no greater than 235 degrees, without evidence of ankylosis.
- Claimed conditions
- spondylosis with spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine, degenerative joint disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 20%
- Decision date
- December 4, 2020
- Citation
- 20077059
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20077059.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an evaluation in excess of 40 percent for his lumbar spine disability has been denied. The Board found that the evidence did not meet the criteria for a higher rating, as there was no unfavorable ankylosis or incapacitating episodes of IVDS.
- Denied
The Board denied an increased rating for the Veteran's lumbar spine disability, finding that there was no evidence of unfavorable ankylosis and thus not warranting a higher rating.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for an extension of a temporary total evaluation based on the need for convalescence due to his service-connected left great toe hallux valgus and degenerative joint disease has been dismissed because this issue was already decided by the Board in January 2026.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to an error in providing notice of a pre-decisional hearing, and the Veteran is entitled to such a hearing before the AOJ.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.