Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Veteran's claim for service connection for a pituitary tumor was denied as there is no evidence of current diagnosis or in-service incurrence.,For the period prior to July 30, 2019, the Veteran's bilateral pes planus was rated at 10 percent. The Board found that the disability did not meet criteria for a higher rating due to lack of objective findings supporting severe flatfoot.,From July 30, 2019, the Veteran is in receipt of a 50 percent rating for his bilateral pes planus, which is the maximum allowable under Diagnostic Code 5276.,The initial noncompensable rating assigned for hypertension was upheld as there were no blood pressure readings meeting criteria for a higher rating.

The deciding factor: There is no evidence of current diagnosis or in-service incurrence of a pituitary tumor. The Veteran's complaints and medical records do not support the presence of a pituitary tumor.,The medical evidence does not show objective findings supporting severe flatfoot, which would warrant a higher rating under Diagnostic Code 5276.,The maximum allowable rating for bilateral pes planus is 50 percent. There are no other schedular criteria that could support a higher rating.,There were no blood pressure readings meeting the criteria for a higher rating (diastolic pressure predominantly 100 or more, or systolic pressure predominantly 160 or more) to warrant an increased rating for hypertension.

Claimed conditions
Pituitary Tumor, Bilateral Pes Planus, Hypertension
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
December 18, 2020
Citation
20080068

Veterans Law Judge

R. JANOFSKY

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20080068.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.