The Board has granted service connection for the cause of death due to Acute Myelocytic Leukemia (AML) based on presumed exposure to herbicide agents during active service.
The deciding factor: The opinion of Dr. Krem established that the Veteran's AML was at least as likely as not caused by his presumed herbicide agent exposure, which was the primary cause of death.
- Claimed conditions
- Acute Myelocytic Leukemia (AML)
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 22, 2020
- Citation
- 20080504
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,287 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20080504.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for Acute Myelocytic Leukemia (AML) due to Agent Orange exposure, finding that the evidence does not show a direct or presumptive relationship between the Veteran's AML and his military service.
- Granted
The Veteran's Acute Myelocytic Leukemia (AML) is granted as service connected due to exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune, which qualifies under the presumptive provisions for diseases associated with contaminants in the water supply.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's leukemia, which significantly contributed to his death, is being remanded for further review due to conflicting diagnoses and the need for additional medical evidence.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's exposure to Agent Orange and ionizing radiation, as well as his prostate cancer. The claims are being returned for further development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.