The Board has determined that central hypogonadism had its onset during active duty service and granted the Veteran's claim for service connection.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the evidence was at least in equipoise as to whether the Veteran’s central hypogonadism had onset during active duty, resolving all reasonable doubt in favor of the Veteran.
- Claimed conditions
- central hypogonadism
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 29, 2020
- Citation
- 20081320
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 3,319 · Granted: 25% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20081320.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for the Veteran's residuals of pituitary adenoma, post-resection, including loss of vision in the right eye, central hypogonadism, BPH, erectile dysfunction and central adrenal insufficiency, finding that his condition is at least as likely as not related to active-duty service due to exposure to herbicide agents.
- Denied
The Veteran's endocrine disability, including central hypogonadism, adrenal insufficiency, gynecomastia, loss of libido, and hyperprolactinemia, was not caused by VA treatment or due to carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or similar instance of fault on the part of VA.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient rationale provided by the VA examiner regarding whether the Veteran's central hypogonadism is proximately due to or aggravated by his service-connected PTSD medications.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that further development is necessary to address the appellant's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to a misdiagnosis and delayed treatment of his endocrine system disability.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.